Blog

Adding Parameters to Annotations Using Rewrite Actions

Alan Richardson
Published Oct 26, 2020

In this blog post, we will:

  • Demonstrate searching and matching annotations
  • Amen annotations using mustache templates

Sensei provides the ability to match problematic code patterns and then amend them to agreed implementations. In this example, I am using @Disabled without a parameter as the problematic code pattern.

Disabled Test Annotation

Disabled tests without a specified reason can prove problematic over the long term because we forget why we disabled it.


@Disabled
   void thisTestMethodHasNoDisabledReason(){
    Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
    }

The risk is that, over time, the code base moves on, the disabled test is not updated in step with the purpose of the code and eventually becomes redundant and irrelevant, and potentially never re-enabled.

During code reviews, we will often point out that it is a good idea to add an explanatory description as the annotation parameter.


@Disabled ("Disabled to demonstrate adding a reason")
    void thisTestMethodHasDisabledReason(){
   Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
   }

A Sensei Recipe

We can write a recipe to detect when @Disabled is added without explanation and a Quick Fix that reminds us to add the actual reason explaining why we disabled it.

When I think about what I'm going to do, I have to:

  • match the Disabled annotation without any parameters
  • change the Disabled annotation to have a parameter with marker text "TODO: add a description here"

Create a Warning Recipe

I use Alt+Enter to Create a new Recipe.

Create A New Recipe Function

Then add the basic descriptive text in the general information.

General Settings

By making the rule a warning, any matching code is highlighted but not shown as a glaring error.

Making The Rule A Warning

Find the Annotation

In the recipe editor, I change the Search to match an annotation.

This will highlight all annotations in the preview.

Recipe Editor

Having done that, I want to filter on the type of annotation.

I could just use Disabled but I fully qualify the class with the package so that it only matches the annotation from JUnit 5. Because the source code is shown in the preview, I can easily copy and paste this in from the actual code to avoid any typos.

I then want to match only annotations without Parameters, and I can use the GUI to do that.

Recipe Settings

i.e. Search:

search:
  annotation:
    type: "org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled"
    without:
       parameters:
          - {}

Create a Rewrite Quick Fix Action

For my QuickFix I will use a rewrite action.

I use the Show Variables functionality to show me the Mustache variables and preview the contents.

QuickFix Settings

And then I add the extra code needed to create the place marker comment.

Add Extra code To Create The Place Marker Comment

i.e. QuickFix:

availableFixes:
 - name: "Add a todo comment parameter"
   actions:
   - rewrite:
      to: "{{{ . }}}(\"TODO: add a description here\")"
      target: "self"

Sensei in Action

We have created a short video showing the recipe creation process in action.

Summary

When building a rewrite Quick Fix, it is easier when we can search for the code element that we want to rewrite, because it is then the self entity we can act on.

In this example, I used a rewrite action to amend the Annotation. Rewrite is a general-purpose action that can apply to any code element and is a good default to explore.

View Resource
View Resource

Learn how to use Sensei to match problematic code patterns and then amend them to agreed implementations with examples of annotation matching.

Interested in more?

Alan Richardson has more than twenty years of professional IT experience, working as a developer and at every level of the testing hierarchy from Tester through to Head of Testing. Head of Developer Relations at Secure Code Warrior, he works directly with teams, to improve the development of quality secure code. Alan is the author of four books including “Dear Evil Tester”, and “Java For Testers”. Alan has also created online training courses to help people learn Technical Web Testing and Selenium WebDriver with Java. Alan posts his writing and training videos on SeleniumSimplified.com, EvilTester.com, JavaForTesters.com, and CompendiumDev.co.uk.

Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.

Book a demo
Share on:
Author
Alan Richardson
Published Oct 26, 2020

Alan Richardson has more than twenty years of professional IT experience, working as a developer and at every level of the testing hierarchy from Tester through to Head of Testing. Head of Developer Relations at Secure Code Warrior, he works directly with teams, to improve the development of quality secure code. Alan is the author of four books including “Dear Evil Tester”, and “Java For Testers”. Alan has also created online training courses to help people learn Technical Web Testing and Selenium WebDriver with Java. Alan posts his writing and training videos on SeleniumSimplified.com, EvilTester.com, JavaForTesters.com, and CompendiumDev.co.uk.

Share on:

In this blog post, we will:

  • Demonstrate searching and matching annotations
  • Amen annotations using mustache templates

Sensei provides the ability to match problematic code patterns and then amend them to agreed implementations. In this example, I am using @Disabled without a parameter as the problematic code pattern.

Disabled Test Annotation

Disabled tests without a specified reason can prove problematic over the long term because we forget why we disabled it.


@Disabled
   void thisTestMethodHasNoDisabledReason(){
    Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
    }

The risk is that, over time, the code base moves on, the disabled test is not updated in step with the purpose of the code and eventually becomes redundant and irrelevant, and potentially never re-enabled.

During code reviews, we will often point out that it is a good idea to add an explanatory description as the annotation parameter.


@Disabled ("Disabled to demonstrate adding a reason")
    void thisTestMethodHasDisabledReason(){
   Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
   }

A Sensei Recipe

We can write a recipe to detect when @Disabled is added without explanation and a Quick Fix that reminds us to add the actual reason explaining why we disabled it.

When I think about what I'm going to do, I have to:

  • match the Disabled annotation without any parameters
  • change the Disabled annotation to have a parameter with marker text "TODO: add a description here"

Create a Warning Recipe

I use Alt+Enter to Create a new Recipe.

Create A New Recipe Function

Then add the basic descriptive text in the general information.

General Settings

By making the rule a warning, any matching code is highlighted but not shown as a glaring error.

Making The Rule A Warning

Find the Annotation

In the recipe editor, I change the Search to match an annotation.

This will highlight all annotations in the preview.

Recipe Editor

Having done that, I want to filter on the type of annotation.

I could just use Disabled but I fully qualify the class with the package so that it only matches the annotation from JUnit 5. Because the source code is shown in the preview, I can easily copy and paste this in from the actual code to avoid any typos.

I then want to match only annotations without Parameters, and I can use the GUI to do that.

Recipe Settings

i.e. Search:

search:
  annotation:
    type: "org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled"
    without:
       parameters:
          - {}

Create a Rewrite Quick Fix Action

For my QuickFix I will use a rewrite action.

I use the Show Variables functionality to show me the Mustache variables and preview the contents.

QuickFix Settings

And then I add the extra code needed to create the place marker comment.

Add Extra code To Create The Place Marker Comment

i.e. QuickFix:

availableFixes:
 - name: "Add a todo comment parameter"
   actions:
   - rewrite:
      to: "{{{ . }}}(\"TODO: add a description here\")"
      target: "self"

Sensei in Action

We have created a short video showing the recipe creation process in action.

Summary

When building a rewrite Quick Fix, it is easier when we can search for the code element that we want to rewrite, because it is then the self entity we can act on.

In this example, I used a rewrite action to amend the Annotation. Rewrite is a general-purpose action that can apply to any code element and is a good default to explore.

View Resource
View Resource

Fill out the form below to download the report

We would like your permission to send you information on our products and/or related secure coding topics. We’ll always treat your personal details with the utmost care and will never sell them to other companies for marketing purposes.

Submit
To submit the form, please enable 'Analytics' cookies. Feel free to disable them again once you're done.

In this blog post, we will:

  • Demonstrate searching and matching annotations
  • Amen annotations using mustache templates

Sensei provides the ability to match problematic code patterns and then amend them to agreed implementations. In this example, I am using @Disabled without a parameter as the problematic code pattern.

Disabled Test Annotation

Disabled tests without a specified reason can prove problematic over the long term because we forget why we disabled it.


@Disabled
   void thisTestMethodHasNoDisabledReason(){
    Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
    }

The risk is that, over time, the code base moves on, the disabled test is not updated in step with the purpose of the code and eventually becomes redundant and irrelevant, and potentially never re-enabled.

During code reviews, we will often point out that it is a good idea to add an explanatory description as the annotation parameter.


@Disabled ("Disabled to demonstrate adding a reason")
    void thisTestMethodHasDisabledReason(){
   Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
   }

A Sensei Recipe

We can write a recipe to detect when @Disabled is added without explanation and a Quick Fix that reminds us to add the actual reason explaining why we disabled it.

When I think about what I'm going to do, I have to:

  • match the Disabled annotation without any parameters
  • change the Disabled annotation to have a parameter with marker text "TODO: add a description here"

Create a Warning Recipe

I use Alt+Enter to Create a new Recipe.

Create A New Recipe Function

Then add the basic descriptive text in the general information.

General Settings

By making the rule a warning, any matching code is highlighted but not shown as a glaring error.

Making The Rule A Warning

Find the Annotation

In the recipe editor, I change the Search to match an annotation.

This will highlight all annotations in the preview.

Recipe Editor

Having done that, I want to filter on the type of annotation.

I could just use Disabled but I fully qualify the class with the package so that it only matches the annotation from JUnit 5. Because the source code is shown in the preview, I can easily copy and paste this in from the actual code to avoid any typos.

I then want to match only annotations without Parameters, and I can use the GUI to do that.

Recipe Settings

i.e. Search:

search:
  annotation:
    type: "org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled"
    without:
       parameters:
          - {}

Create a Rewrite Quick Fix Action

For my QuickFix I will use a rewrite action.

I use the Show Variables functionality to show me the Mustache variables and preview the contents.

QuickFix Settings

And then I add the extra code needed to create the place marker comment.

Add Extra code To Create The Place Marker Comment

i.e. QuickFix:

availableFixes:
 - name: "Add a todo comment parameter"
   actions:
   - rewrite:
      to: "{{{ . }}}(\"TODO: add a description here\")"
      target: "self"

Sensei in Action

We have created a short video showing the recipe creation process in action.

Summary

When building a rewrite Quick Fix, it is easier when we can search for the code element that we want to rewrite, because it is then the self entity we can act on.

In this example, I used a rewrite action to amend the Annotation. Rewrite is a general-purpose action that can apply to any code element and is a good default to explore.

Access resource

Click on the link below and download the PDF of this resource.

Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.

View reportBook a demo
Share on:
Interested in more?

Share on:
Author
Alan Richardson
Published Oct 26, 2020

Alan Richardson has more than twenty years of professional IT experience, working as a developer and at every level of the testing hierarchy from Tester through to Head of Testing. Head of Developer Relations at Secure Code Warrior, he works directly with teams, to improve the development of quality secure code. Alan is the author of four books including “Dear Evil Tester”, and “Java For Testers”. Alan has also created online training courses to help people learn Technical Web Testing and Selenium WebDriver with Java. Alan posts his writing and training videos on SeleniumSimplified.com, EvilTester.com, JavaForTesters.com, and CompendiumDev.co.uk.

Share on:

In this blog post, we will:

  • Demonstrate searching and matching annotations
  • Amen annotations using mustache templates

Sensei provides the ability to match problematic code patterns and then amend them to agreed implementations. In this example, I am using @Disabled without a parameter as the problematic code pattern.

Disabled Test Annotation

Disabled tests without a specified reason can prove problematic over the long term because we forget why we disabled it.


@Disabled
   void thisTestMethodHasNoDisabledReason(){
    Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
    }

The risk is that, over time, the code base moves on, the disabled test is not updated in step with the purpose of the code and eventually becomes redundant and irrelevant, and potentially never re-enabled.

During code reviews, we will often point out that it is a good idea to add an explanatory description as the annotation parameter.


@Disabled ("Disabled to demonstrate adding a reason")
    void thisTestMethodHasDisabledReason(){
   Assertions.fail("This test is disabled and should not run");
   }

A Sensei Recipe

We can write a recipe to detect when @Disabled is added without explanation and a Quick Fix that reminds us to add the actual reason explaining why we disabled it.

When I think about what I'm going to do, I have to:

  • match the Disabled annotation without any parameters
  • change the Disabled annotation to have a parameter with marker text "TODO: add a description here"

Create a Warning Recipe

I use Alt+Enter to Create a new Recipe.

Create A New Recipe Function

Then add the basic descriptive text in the general information.

General Settings

By making the rule a warning, any matching code is highlighted but not shown as a glaring error.

Making The Rule A Warning

Find the Annotation

In the recipe editor, I change the Search to match an annotation.

This will highlight all annotations in the preview.

Recipe Editor

Having done that, I want to filter on the type of annotation.

I could just use Disabled but I fully qualify the class with the package so that it only matches the annotation from JUnit 5. Because the source code is shown in the preview, I can easily copy and paste this in from the actual code to avoid any typos.

I then want to match only annotations without Parameters, and I can use the GUI to do that.

Recipe Settings

i.e. Search:

search:
  annotation:
    type: "org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled"
    without:
       parameters:
          - {}

Create a Rewrite Quick Fix Action

For my QuickFix I will use a rewrite action.

I use the Show Variables functionality to show me the Mustache variables and preview the contents.

QuickFix Settings

And then I add the extra code needed to create the place marker comment.

Add Extra code To Create The Place Marker Comment

i.e. QuickFix:

availableFixes:
 - name: "Add a todo comment parameter"
   actions:
   - rewrite:
      to: "{{{ . }}}(\"TODO: add a description here\")"
      target: "self"

Sensei in Action

We have created a short video showing the recipe creation process in action.

Summary

When building a rewrite Quick Fix, it is easier when we can search for the code element that we want to rewrite, because it is then the self entity we can act on.

In this example, I used a rewrite action to amend the Annotation. Rewrite is a general-purpose action that can apply to any code element and is a good default to explore.

Table of contents

View Resource
Interested in more?

Alan Richardson has more than twenty years of professional IT experience, working as a developer and at every level of the testing hierarchy from Tester through to Head of Testing. Head of Developer Relations at Secure Code Warrior, he works directly with teams, to improve the development of quality secure code. Alan is the author of four books including “Dear Evil Tester”, and “Java For Testers”. Alan has also created online training courses to help people learn Technical Web Testing and Selenium WebDriver with Java. Alan posts his writing and training videos on SeleniumSimplified.com, EvilTester.com, JavaForTesters.com, and CompendiumDev.co.uk.

Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.

Book a demoDownload
Share on:
Resource hub

Resources to get you started

More posts
Resource hub

Resources to get you started

More posts