How-to Avoid Username Enumeration | Secure Code Warrior
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Username enumeration is when hackers use brute-force attacks to get username & password info. Learn how to avoid username enumeration with Secure Code Warrior.
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demo
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Click on the link below and download the PDF of this resource.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
View reportBook a demo
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Table of contents
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demoDownloadResources to get you started
Benchmarking Security Skills: Streamlining Secure-by-Design in the Enterprise
Finding meaningful data on the success of Secure-by-Design initiatives is notoriously difficult. CISOs are often challenged when attempting to prove the return on investment (ROI) and business value of security program activities at both the people and company levels. Not to mention, it’s particularly difficult for enterprises to gain insights into how their organizations are benchmarked against current industry standards. The President’s National Cybersecurity Strategy challenged stakeholders to “embrace security and resilience by design.” The key to making Secure-by-Design initiatives work is not only giving developers the skills to ensure secure code, but also assuring the regulators that those skills are in place. In this presentation, we share a myriad of qualitative and quantitative data, derived from multiple primary sources, including internal data points collected from over 250,000 developers, data-driven customer insights, and public studies. Leveraging this aggregation of data points, we aim to communicate a vision of the current state of Secure-by-Design initiatives across multiple verticals. The report details why this space is currently underutilized, the significant impact a successful upskilling program can have on cybersecurity risk mitigation, and the potential to eliminate categories of vulnerabilities from a codebase.
Secure code training topics & content
Our industry-leading content is always evolving to fit the ever changing software development landscape with your role in mind. Topics covering everything from AI to XQuery Injection, offered for a variety of roles from Architects and Engineers to Product Managers and QA. Get a sneak peak of what our content catalog has to offer by topic and role.
Quests: Industry leading learning to keep developers ahead of the game mitigating risk.
Quests is a learning platform that helps developers mitigate software security risks by enhancing their secure coding skills. With curated learning paths, hands-on challenges, and interactive activities, it empowers developers to identify and prevent vulnerabilities.
Resources to get you started
Is Vibe Coding Going to Turn Your Codebase Into a Frat Party?
Vibe coding is like a college frat party, and AI is the centerpiece of all the festivities, the keg. It’s a lot of fun to let loose, get creative, and see where your imagination can take you, but after a few keg stands, drinking (or, using AI) in moderation is undoubtedly the safer long-term solution.
The Decade of the Defenders: Secure Code Warrior Turns Ten
Secure Code Warrior's founding team has stayed together, steering the ship through every lesson, triumph, and setback for an entire decade. We’re scaling up and ready to face our next chapter, SCW 2.0, as the leaders in developer risk management.
Developer-driven coding.
Securely.
Contact us today and make software security an intrinsic part of your development process.
