Coders Conquer Security Infrastructure as Code Series: Insecure Cryptography
Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense.
Matias Madou, Ph.D. is a security expert, researcher, and CTO and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior. Matias obtained his Ph.D. in Application Security from Ghent University, focusing on static analysis solutions. He later joined Fortify in the US, where he realized that it was insufficient to solely detect code problems without aiding developers in writing secure code. This inspired him to develop products that assist developers, alleviate the burden of security, and exceed customers' expectations. When he is not at his desk as part of Team Awesome, he enjoys being on stage presenting at conferences including RSA Conference, BlackHat and DefCon.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demoMatias Madou, Ph.D. is a security expert, researcher, and CTO and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior. Matias obtained his Ph.D. in Application Security from Ghent University, focusing on static analysis solutions. He later joined Fortify in the US, where he realized that it was insufficient to solely detect code problems without aiding developers in writing secure code. This inspired him to develop products that assist developers, alleviate the burden of security, and exceed customers' expectations. When he is not at his desk as part of Team Awesome, he enjoys being on stage presenting at conferences including RSA Conference, BlackHat and DefCon.
Matias is a researcher and developer with more than 15 years of hands-on software security experience. He has developed solutions for companies such as Fortify Software and his own company Sensei Security. Over his career, Matias has led multiple application security research projects which have led to commercial products and boasts over 10 patents under his belt. When he is away from his desk, Matias has served as an instructor for advanced application security training courses and regularly speaks at global conferences including RSA Conference, Black Hat, DefCon, BSIMM, OWASP AppSec and BruCon.
Matias holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Ghent University, where he studied application security through program obfuscation to hide the inner workings of an application.
Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.
Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.
Click on the link below and download the PDF of this resource.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
View reportBook a demoMatias Madou, Ph.D. is a security expert, researcher, and CTO and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior. Matias obtained his Ph.D. in Application Security from Ghent University, focusing on static analysis solutions. He later joined Fortify in the US, where he realized that it was insufficient to solely detect code problems without aiding developers in writing secure code. This inspired him to develop products that assist developers, alleviate the burden of security, and exceed customers' expectations. When he is not at his desk as part of Team Awesome, he enjoys being on stage presenting at conferences including RSA Conference, BlackHat and DefCon.
Matias is a researcher and developer with more than 15 years of hands-on software security experience. He has developed solutions for companies such as Fortify Software and his own company Sensei Security. Over his career, Matias has led multiple application security research projects which have led to commercial products and boasts over 10 patents under his belt. When he is away from his desk, Matias has served as an instructor for advanced application security training courses and regularly speaks at global conferences including RSA Conference, Black Hat, DefCon, BSIMM, OWASP AppSec and BruCon.
Matias holds a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Ghent University, where he studied application security through program obfuscation to hide the inner workings of an application.
Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.
Table of contents
Matias Madou, Ph.D. is a security expert, researcher, and CTO and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior. Matias obtained his Ph.D. in Application Security from Ghent University, focusing on static analysis solutions. He later joined Fortify in the US, where he realized that it was insufficient to solely detect code problems without aiding developers in writing secure code. This inspired him to develop products that assist developers, alleviate the burden of security, and exceed customers' expectations. When he is not at his desk as part of Team Awesome, he enjoys being on stage presenting at conferences including RSA Conference, BlackHat and DefCon.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demoDownloadResources to get you started
Benchmarking Security Skills: Streamlining Secure-by-Design in the Enterprise
The Secure-by-Design movement is the future of secure software development. Learn about the key elements companies need to keep in mind when they think about a Secure-by-Design initiative.
DigitalOcean Decreases Security Debt with Secure Code Warrior
DigitalOcean's use of Secure Code Warrior training has significantly reduced security debt, allowing teams to focus more on innovation and productivity. The improved security has strengthened their product quality and competitive edge. Looking ahead, the SCW Trust Score will help them further enhance security practices and continue driving innovation.
Resources to get you started
Trust Score Reveals the Value of Secure-by-Design Upskilling Initiatives
Our research has shown that secure code training works. Trust Score, using an algorithm drawing on more than 20 million learning data points from work by more than 250,000 learners at over 600 organizations, reveals its effectiveness in driving down vulnerabilities and how to make the initiative even more effective.
Reactive Versus Preventive Security: Prevention Is a Better Cure
The idea of bringing preventive security to legacy code and systems at the same time as newer applications can seem daunting, but a Secure-by-Design approach, enforced by upskilling developers, can apply security best practices to those systems. It’s the best chance many organizations have of improving their security postures.
The Benefits of Benchmarking Security Skills for Developers
The growing focus on secure code and Secure-by-Design principles requires developers to be trained in cybersecurity from the start of the SDLC, with tools like Secure Code Warrior’s Trust Score helping measure and improve their progress.
Driving Meaningful Success for Enterprise Secure-by-Design Initiatives
Our latest research paper, Benchmarking Security Skills: Streamlining Secure-by-Design in the Enterprise is the result of deep analysis of real Secure-by-Design initiatives at the enterprise level, and deriving best practice approaches based on data-driven findings.